Back Home Next

 

 

 

 

 

Force for Tomorrow
Education Project
Land-Use Project
Base Promotion
Mission Watch
About ECA
Ron's Gallery
2006 Calendar


Land-Use Compatibility -- 2006 Project

OBJECTIVE: Encourage appropriate land-use compatibility for Edwards Air Force Base, and prevent encroachment of R-2508 airspace.


 

Project Background

Edwards Air Force Base has operated in our local desert for many decades without  many encroachment issues. However, a natural by-product of our community's robust population growth and industrial expansion have presented new challenges: a) tall energy producing wind turbines and communication towers can threaten aviation flight testing; b) the lack of tertiary sewage treatment plants allow effluent to interfere with emergency  dry lake runways; c) real estate developments are beginning to compete for land-uses that are in conflict with aircraft flight testing; and d) civilian and military communications systems are often competing for the same frequency spectrums.

ECA maintains contact with appropriate AFFTC organizations, and encourages community vigilance in minimizing encroachment hazards to full utilization of EAFB and R-2508 protected airspace.

Planned Land-Use Deliverables

  • Video

  • Community Briefings

  • Land Use Map

  • Media Releases

Project Organization

  • Chairman: Tom Weil, Manager, California City Airport.

Types of Encroachment

Encroachment is a growing concern for the Department of Defense, as well as States and local communities concerned about retaining adjacent military bases. Recently EAFB, government, and business interests have found ways to cooperate in retaining compatible land-use for military test activities.

ECA’s Land-Use Compatibility committee has met with Dwight Deakin, Manager of Air Force Flight Test Encroachment Prevention to review potential encroachment issues. Some of the compatibility categories discussed in these meetings are as follows:

Airspace Control—According to Deakin, Edwards is vitally concerned with preserving the R-2508 airspace from any encroachment source.

Electromagnetic Spectrum—population increases and a limited radio frequency bandwidth can sometimes result in great expense if military communications systems must be redesigned to use other portions of the frequency spectrum.

Vertical Obstructions — Cell phones and other communication systems require towers that can present flying hazards. Wind turbines are sometimes designed for mounting on extremely high towers that often require joint planning by all stakeholders.

Population Growth — Our Aerospace Valley housing and population densities have been growing robustly over the last several years. This can result in new homeowners living under flight operations and being subjected to sonic booms that they may not have expected.

Environmental Concerns — High altitude Air Force testing avoids many of the land-based conservation and endangered species issues. However, the military must ensure that its test operations are compatible with air and water quality standards.

Legislative Issues — It is necessary for those concerned with avoiding future encroachment issues to carefully monitor new legislative initiatives. Sometimes, bills that are introduced for a benign purpose, can have unintended encroachment consequences.       

Edwards Community Alliance Board Votes its Opposition to Cantil Dumping

RESOLUTION OF THE EDWARDS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
OPPOSING THE EASTERN KERN RECYCLING AND RENEWABLE ENERGY DISTRICT

Whereas, aerospace flight test and training operations at Edwards Air Force Base, the China Lake Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, and the Mojave Airport/Spaceport play vital roles in the defense of freedom and the economy of Kern County, and are the largest employers in Eastern Kern County, and

Whereas, the space tourism industry being developed at the Mojave Airport/Spaceport is an industry that will have a significant impact on the economic future of East Kern and the rest of Kern County, and

Whereas, the primary threat to the continued viability of East Kern’s aerospace industry is encroachment, which can include degradation of air quality, construction of tall structures that can interfere with flight operations, unplanned urbanization, birds, and other factors, and

Whereas, encroachment can result in shifting of military operations from East Kern bases to other states, and officials of other states are constantly attempting to recruit businesses engaged in spaceflight and other aerospace operations from Mojave and East Kern to their states, and

Whereas, there is an attempt underway to establish the Eastern Kern County Recycling and Renewable Energy District which includes a garbage landfill in Cantil so Los Angeles and other Southern California communities can import their trash into Kern County, and

Whereas, construction of the proposed 3,100-acre landfill and “energy park” in Cantil will significantly increase emissions of dust and other particulate matter, attract birds, generate flies, and may result in construction of wind turbine towers, all of which can negatively impact aerospace operations in the region and in the R-2515 controlled airspace, and

Whereas, increased dust and other particulate matter could once again result in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reclassifying East Kern in a manner that would place restrictions on expansion of aerospace and other industrial development in East Kern, and

Whereas, protections against encroachment established by the Kern County Board of Supervisors will be bypassed by placing this proposal before county voters rather than submitting it for consideration and public participation to the Board and the county planning commission, and

Now Therefore Be it Resolved that the board of directors of the Edwards Community Alliance, at their meeting at the Vernon P. Saxon Aerospace Museum in Boron on Monday, March 20th, 2006, voted unanimously to oppose the siting, permitting, ownership, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the Eastern Kern County Recycling and Renewable Energy District and urges Kern County residents to not sign petitions to place this issue before county voters and, in the event the proposal qualifies for the ballot, to oppose it at the November election.

_________________________________
William H. Deaver, President

 

 

 

 

Project News

City Settles "Accident Potential Zones"  (APZ) Issue

by Jessie Stensland

 

The city of Oak Harbor now has tighter restrictions aimed at preventing encroachment or intrusive development around Whidbey Island Naval Air Station. 
 

Last week, the City Council unanimously passed an ordinance that restricts land use on property within “accident potential zones” off the end of a runway at the Navy base, as well as an adjacent buffer zone.
 

Mayor Patty Cohen said she recently returned from Washington, D.C., where she shared the city’s actions to prevent base encroachment with officials from other military communities, as well as the Pentagon. She said they were impressed.
 

“They had never heard of anything like this before,” she said. “This was a first.”
 

Cohen led the way in development of the new zoning restriction after the Navy released a map last fall that shows about 60 acres on the north end of the city falls within accident potential zones, or APZs, which are areas where plane accidents are more likely to occur.
Some officials were alarmed that the 2005 round of Base Realignment and Closures showed that encroachment is a key concern for the federal government in deciding which bases to close.
 

Compensation is requested
 

Retired car dealership owner Don Boyer is the trustee for 17 acres within the new APZ. After he agreed to sell the land to a developer, the City Council passed a moratorium on development within APZs.
 

Boyer’s attorney, C. Thomas Moser of Mount Vernon, wrote a letter to the planning commission Feb. 24 stating that his client strongly opposes any restrictions that exceed those established by the Navy.
 

“If the City’s actions results in a diminution of the value of the above property,” he wrote, “my client will look to the City of Oak Harbor for compensation.”
 

The restrictions are, indeed, more conservative than the military’s Air Installation Compatible Use Zone guidelines, but they have the approval of the Navy. City Development Services Director Steve Powers said Capt. Syd Abernethy wrote a letter in support of the planning commission recommendations.
 

It’s unclear whether the new restrictions will affect the value of the land. The city is having the Boyer property appraised. Cohen wants to obtain county, state and federal government funds to purchase the 17 acres and plant it with trees.
 

Last week, City Council members followed the planning commission recommendations to amend city code. The change affects 60 acres that fall within the accident potential zone within the city, plus a swath of land within a third accident potential “buffer” zone southwest and parallel to the APZs.
 

Under the amendments, there are now three accident potential and three noise subdistricts within the aviation overlay zone. An overlay zone adds land-use restrictions on top of the underlying zoning.
 

Each subdistrict has somewhat different restrictions on the maximum number of people per acre and the allowed uses. The purpose is to restrict the number of people that congregate in an area with a greater risk of being the site of a Navy plane crash.
 

A maximum of 25 people per acre are allowed in accident potential subdistrict 1, which is the area with the greatest risk. A maximum 30 people per acre are allowed in subdistrict 2; no more than 50 people per acre are allowed in subdistrict 3.
 

Based on the maximum densities, planners created a list of permitted land uses in each accident subdistrict. Car sales, for example, is allowed in all the accident potential subdistricts. But drive-in banks are only allowed in subdistricts 2 and 3.
 

In addition, development in an accident potential subdistrict must conform to floor-to-area ratio restrictions. Each permitted land use has a floor area ratio, which restricts the gross floor area of buildings according to the amount of land they sit on.
 

New park now found illegal
 

Powers told the council that the creation of a third noise subdistrict will affect development of a regional park at the city’s closed landfill site. The northern portion of the park site is located within the new subdistrict. The city has long planned to build a large park near the municipal works facility once the landfill stops releasing methane gas.
 

“Outdoor sports facilities and parks are not considered compatible uses within this subdistrict,” Powers said. The council members did not question him about the issue.
 

In addition, the council adopted both additions and subtractions to the list of permitted uses in the accident potential subdistricts. The changes eliminate scientific instrument manufacturing, restaurants, landfills, rapid transit terminals, amateur radio towers, and radio and

TV broadcasting stations as permitted uses in accident potential subdistricts.
 

On the other hand, the changes allow car washes, coffee kiosks, contractor offices, equipment rental, garden supply stores, and plant nurseries in the accident zones.



© Copyright 2006 Whidbey News Times
 

The military affairs articles sent out to this list are for your general information.  NGA does not always confirm with each Governor's office the data contained in each article, nor does NGA necessarily support all efforts described in each publication.  These emails are simply meant to help keep you informed on military affairs activities reported in the press.  Please note that NGA always attaches the name of the newspaper or publication where the article appears.

 

Tara A. Butler, Esq.

Senior Policy Analyst

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices

 

Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources

444 N Capitol St, Suite 267

Washington, DC 20001-1512

P: (202) 624-5357

F: (202) 624-5313

E: tbutler@nga.org

 

 

Copyright © 2006, Edwards Community Alliance